🔗 Share this article

During the previous presidential campaign, the former president wooed voters with pledges to lower costs immediately upon taking office. But, once his inauguration, there was minimal attention to affordability issues. This shifted after price-fatigued citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, the Trump administration launched a slapdash effort to tackle affordability. Regrettably, the drive has proven a disorganized endeavor—filled with absurdity, contradictions, magical thinking, scapegoating, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Reality

Just two days after the election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a disastrous statement: “Food prices are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from billionaire Trump—often associates with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated a lack of empathy for millions of Americans facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their concerns as trivial, suggesting they had it wrong about actual costs.

This statement about declining prices proved highly misleading and dishonest. In what way could every price be falling when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Official statistics show banana prices rose 6.9% over the past year, beef prices climbed 14.7%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—partly due to import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, prices rose in the majority of food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, such as animal proteins (rising over 4%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Economic Claims

In spite of these numbers, Trump persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. Since election day, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and asserted “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks ignore the fact that prices overall have clearly increased after the previous administration. At present, inflation is at a 3% annual rate, which is 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, Trump claimed that fuel costs had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, even though government figures show they are $3.19.

Confronted by reality and declining opinion polls, advisers evidently warned that his “prices are down” rhetoric portrayed him as dangerously out of touch from ordinary people. A lot of voters are frustrated about rising costs following promises of decreases. As a result, aides suggested a simple solution: reduce certain import taxes. This sensible idea contradicted Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs wouldn’t raise prices for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Effects

With certain taxes reduced on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has cut prices once these products begin to fall in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for putting out a fire that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing fast-food leaders, Trump declared that “this is the golden age of America” and told the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households who are struggling—especially when millions face losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

According to a survey from October, 74% of Americans believe economic conditions are fair or poor, while only 26% rate them positive. Another poll showed that 61% of Americans say Trump’s policies have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Truth and Suggested Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s chief financial officer, lately disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the US economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and shed around tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, the secretary called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to widespread concern about affordability, the president proposed a cash handout of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like manna from heaven, but it is unlikely that Congress—concerned about large shortfalls—will enact the proposal. This idea would likely increase federal spending, increase borrowing costs, and potentially fuel inflation by injecting cash into the economy.

A further supposed fix for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. But, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently reducing them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these loans could more than double the overall cost homeowners pay and hinder their accumulation of equity.

Faulting the Past Government and Economic Outlook

As part of their affordability campaign, Trump and his team have once more blamed the previous president for financial challenges, including increasing costs. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. Actually, Biden left a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. But, Trump’s policies—especially his tariffs—have created an difficult situation, pushing up prices and slowing GDP growth.

Per an economist, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He worries that if key regions like major economies enter a downturn, the US could face a widespread recession. During recessions, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and price increases often falls. Sadly, given the highly-touted cost initiative probably ineffective to hold down prices, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up pushing the nation into recession—a scenario that hard-pressed households cannot handle.